isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?
isnt g(t) * d (t-t0) = g(t-t0) since impulse is an identity for convolution?